tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Remy Maucherat <>
Subject Re: JK Todo List
Date Mon, 11 Oct 2004 15:25:16 GMT
Costin Manolache wrote:

> Henri Gomez wrote:
>> Well JK using APR will be a good solution for every webservers but 
>> Apache 1.3.x.
>> Apache 2.x came with APR,  IIS, Domino and others should have no
>> problems to use an external APR library (.so, .dll).
>> So the remaining question will be shoud we drop Apache 1.3.x support
>> in future JK 1.2.x or should we start a 'new' APR JK 1.2.x based
>> implementation ?
> Why use APR in mod_jk ?
> Support for Apache1.3 is IMO more important than support for IIS. And 
> so far, mod_jk seems to work without any apr - and it is in 
> maintainance mode, so no major changes should be made.

I think good Apache 1.3 support is more important than improving IIS 
support. IIS is not gaining market share these days, and it seems quite 
obvious most of the new IIS 6 installations are going to be used to run 
.not web components.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message