tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bill Barker" <wbar...@wilshire.com>
Subject Re: More needed connector refactoring
Date Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:21:05 GMT

----- Original Message -----
From: "Costin Manolache" <cmanolache@yahoo.com>
To: <tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 9:01 AM
Subject: Re: More needed connector refactoring


> Remy Maucherat wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > - I'll add a thread pool similar to the one in Tomcat 4.0, as an
> > optional policy to the current one; the idea is that it's very dumb, and
> > could be more stable in some environments (that RH 9 thing ...), but is
> > not as efficient as the current one; I'll do some benchmarks to see if
> > for a single CPU computer there's any difference between the two, and I
> > propose that whichever is the fastest for that use case becomes the
> > default one (with a preference for the TC 4.0 one in case of a tie, as
> > it's simpler)
>
> I'm a bit confused - what happened with the thread pool and how did we
> end up with 2 ? I missed this change.
>
>
> > - I think conf/jk2.properties should go, since we can have arbitrary
> > properties on the Connector element, and additionally, it has an
> > extremely confusing name; any comments on that ?
>
> +1 :-)

It will make the Connector element in server.xml really hideous, and
restrict component names to be valid XML attribute names (e.g.
channelSocket.localhost:8009 is a no-no :).  Other than that, I don't see a
problem.

>
> Costin
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>


Mime
View raw message