Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 50132 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2004 06:04:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Aug 2004 06:04:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 20356 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2004 06:03:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 20140 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2004 06:03:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 20127 invoked by uid 99); 10 Aug 2004 06:03:46 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.1 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [80.91.224.249] (HELO main.gmane.org) (80.91.224.249) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 23:03:44 -0700 Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BuPja-0002e9-00 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 08:03:42 +0200 Received: from adsl-63-201-231-248.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net ([63.201.231.248]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 08:03:42 +0200 Received: from cmanolache by adsl-63-201-231-248.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 08:03:42 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org From: Costin Manolache Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.0.28 release Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 23:03:38 -0700 Lines: 34 Message-ID: References: <4117A992.8040405@sun.com> <4117B362.5050505@apache.org> <4117B718.5000107@joedog.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-63-201-231-248.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (X11/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <4117B718.5000107@joedog.org> Sender: news X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I'm sorry, but can't remember - why do we still need the endorsed ? I tought they were a temporary solution for JDK1.4 and some validation problems - tomcat should work fine with any SAX/DOM parser, including the one in JDK1.4. The only problem is JDK1.3 - and I agree that it would be better to just provide a patch for 1.3 ( or ask the user to install a parser in jre/ext or classpath, to get the same behavior as in 1.4 ). Or even better - in Bootstrap check if we're in 1.3 and add the parser to the classpath, otherwise use whatever is in jdk ( and maybe turn validation of if the version of jdk and parser is not the right one ). In any case - modularizing the distribution would be really good. Having a core JDK1.5 distro, and additional packages to add JDK1.4 and JDK1.3 support is good. It would also be good to distribute more components as optional plug-ins. Again - I missed a lot of discussions, probably most of this has been discussed, I'll try more searches on the archives :-) Costin Tim Funk wrote: > Didn't we already try that with the tomcat 4 LE edition? > > -Tim > > Remy Maucherat wrote: > >> My current idea for the new branch is to ship a JDK 1.5 bundle with a >> separate zip/tar.gz to easily install the additional binaries when >> using JDK 1.4-. This will be smaller (no JMX, no Xerces) and maybe >> higher quality (more testing of the bundled components ?). --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org