Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 40014 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2004 06:30:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Aug 2004 06:30:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 95251 invoked by uid 500); 21 Aug 2004 06:29:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 95190 invoked by uid 500); 21 Aug 2004 06:29:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 95175 invoked by uid 99); 21 Aug 2004 06:29:50 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [208.48.139.185] (HELO forty.greenhydrant.com) (208.48.139.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 23:29:47 -0700 Received: from [10.0.0.10] (66-75-244-1.san.rr.com [66.75.244.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by forty.greenhydrant.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22868E38FA for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 23:29:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4126EBD6.3090600@greenhydrant.com> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 23:29:42 -0700 From: David Rees User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: Where's 4.1.31? References: <9C5166762F311146951505C6790A9CF801FC38F3@US-VS1.corp.mpi.com> <41262AAF.2020104@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <41262AAF.2020104@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote, On 8/20/2004 9:45 AM: > > Althrough I agree with peoples that can't move to Tomcat 5, Tomcat 5 has > been available for more that 1 year. That will be good for Tomcat if > people migrate from 4.1.x to 5 and find bugs (that way they will not be > carried into 5.5/6). Although I would love to upgrade all of my sites to Tomcat 5, unfortunately there is one particular showstopper for me in the behavior difference between Tomcat 4 and 5. Specifically, it is the fact that TC5 no longer pauses request processing during a context reload while TC4 does. While this behavior could be worked around with load-balanced Tomcats, until mod_jk (or the Apache proxy module improvements) support dynamic reconfiguration, having to make a class change during operations can be disruptive. Currently, if you wish to disable a Tomcat using mod_jk, you have to at least have Apache gracefully restart, which is not always very graceful. IMO, if there are enough commiters willing to make/support another 4.1 release, let them! -Dave --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org