Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 87466 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2004 12:39:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jul 2004 12:39:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 49355 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2004 12:39:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 49296 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2004 12:39:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 49280 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jul 2004 12:39:20 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [192.18.33.10] (HELO exchange.sun.com) (192.18.33.10) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with SMTP; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 05:39:18 -0700 Received: (qmail 9954 invoked by uid 50); 12 Jul 2004 12:40:39 -0000 Date: 12 Jul 2004 12:40:39 -0000 Message-ID: <20040712124039.9953.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Cc: Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27829] - server diying after: SEVERE: Caught exception trying to unlock accept.\njava.net.SocketException: Network is unreachable X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27829 server diying after: SEVERE: Caught exception trying to unlock accept.\njava.net.SocketException: Network is unreachable hauser@acm.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | ------- Additional Comments From hauser@acm.org 2004-07-12 12:40 ------- Sure, the exception came from the JVM, but why do you claim that the JVM is shutting down due to this? To me, it rather appears that the tomcat code neither bothers to i) catch and analyze java.net.SocketException which may well be of very temporary nature nor ii) provides a useful log-output that helps an admin to fix the issue without having to fully restart tomcat. it appears that unlockAccept() in PoolTcpEndpoint.java isn't prepared to do anything smart when a SocketException comes along - or am I wrong? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org