tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jess Holle <je...@ptc.com>
Subject Re: [5.next] Progress
Date Wed, 07 Jul 2004 17:27:27 GMT
Remy Maucherat wrote:

> Jess Holle wrote:
>
>> In my case even with 1.5 I need a pluggable (2) from above.  Why?  
>> Because I need to work with port ranges and grab the first free port 
>> (with MBeans then proxied to a daemon with a consistent port #).  1.5 
>> has no automatic machinery for this as best I can tell.
>>
>> It's true that (1) is simple getPlatformMbeanServer() [or whatever it 
>> is called again] in 1.5, but I believe it should be light and easy 
>> enough to stick something else under the covers here.
>
> I'm tired of interfaces, so I have to say I'm against this, especially 
> for a specific purpose (I would tend to believe you can configure lots 
> of stuff with JDK 1.5, though). You should simply use your own server 
> listener (I think server lifecycle listeners are here to stay).
>
>> Cool.  As I said though, I've got my own processes to instrument 
>> first.  I'd just like to see Tomcat progress in a similar fashion so 
>> that one monitor Tomcat in the same fashion sooner rather than later.
>
> Regardless on how the JMX connector is configured on the server side, 
> it will work the same from the client's perspective.

Yep.  I'm just anxious to see JMX RMI remoting support in Tomcat soon, 
i.e. in a stable shipping version that supports a stable, shipping JRE 
(i.e. 1.4.2).

--
Jess Holle

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message