tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Shapira, Yoav" <Yoav.Shap...@mpi.com>
Subject RE: Time for 5.0.26?
Date Tue, 01 Jun 2004 12:54:32 GMT

Hi,
Yeah, go ahead with the refactoring.  I'll tag 5.0.26 tonight (on HEAD of course) unless I
hear some last-minute things on this list during the day today.

I'm going to open a separate thread on CVS branching, I need a bit of clarification in that
area.

Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Filip Hanik (lists) [mailto:devlists@hanik.com]
>Sent: Sunday, May 30, 2004 10:54 AM
>To: Tomcat Developers List
>Subject: RE: Time for 5.0.26?
>
>>I think 5.0.x should be put in a tomcat_5_branch, while the refactoring
>>is done in HEAD. Or I use a separate folder.
>
>I would agree that the refactoring should be done in HEAD, and put 5.0.x in
>a branch
>Filip
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:remm@apache.org]
>Sent: Sunday, May 30, 2004 9:21 AM
>To: Tomcat Developers List
>Subject: Re: Time for 5.0.26?
>
>
>Filip Hanik (lists) wrote:
>>>BTW, is it ok if I start my refatoring(s) in a separate branch based on
>>
>> go ahead, refator. :-)
>
>I'll "refator" then.
>
>I'll redo logging as well, and define c-l categories (for webapps, for
>example) to be able to eventually remove Logger altogether.
>Other things:
>- attempt to redo a bit the deployer to be able to remove the CL code
>which is there to avoid JAR locking (and then use the optimized CL for
>the whole container); this is for faster startup
>- switch to something other than digester to remove some commons deps
>(?) (I'm thinking about beanutils and collections); if we don't do that,
>I think we should do package renaming on these utilities to lower the
>likelihood of a user being locked into a specific release
>- I'll try to avoid touching the sensitive stuff as much as possible
>(connector, anything related with the servlet API impl) to avoid
>regressions
>
>(obviously the two branches will need to remain synced)
>
>I think 5.0.x should be put in a tomcat_5_branch, while the refactoring
>is done in HEAD. Or I use a separate folder.
>
>Rémy
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>---
>Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.692 / Virus Database: 453 - Release Date: 5/28/2004
>
>---
>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.692 / Virus Database: 453 - Release Date: 5/28/2004
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org




This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may
contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged.  This e-mail is intended
only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed,
disclosed or used by anyone else.  If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately
delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender.  Thank you.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message