Return-Path: 
 <tomcat-dev-return-43318-apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 81875 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2004 10:21:59 -0000
Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Apr 2004 10:21:59 -0000
Received: (qmail 8012 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2004 10:21:26 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 7972 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2004 10:21:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tomcat-dev-subscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" <tomcat-dev.jakarta.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" <tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 7949 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2004 10:21:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO web10505.mail.yahoo.com) (216.136.130.155)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Apr 2004 10:21:25 -0000
Message-ID: <20040401102139.42647.qmail@web10505.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [203.193.165.130] by web10505.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP;
 Thu, 01 Apr 2004 02:21:39 PST
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 02:21:39 -0800 (PST)
From: Sriram N <sriramx_2000@yahoo.com>
Subject: Thanks Craig (Was: Re: TC evolment)
To: Tomcat Developers List <tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <406BE5CE.8050506@apache.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N


--- Craig McClanahan <craigmcc@apache.org> wrote:

> <wistful-smile>
> And to think it was only a couple of years ago that I got thorougly 
> chastised (by more than a few people participating in this thread :-) 
> for suggesting that Tomcat standalone might actually be a viable 
> production solution for some applications.
> </wistful-smile>

If it makes you feel good:

I was a lurker on those old threads. I'm happy to say that I decided to go
along with your judgement and use Tomcat for some solutions that we'd need to
deliver. I'd used TC 4.0.1 way back then, and our apps are still running fine
on the following configuration :Win98, Pentium 200MMX, 64 MB RAM, JDK 1.3.1.

> 
> Craig McClanahan
> 

-- Sriram

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway 
http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org