tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Angus Mezick" <amez...@guidestar.org>
Subject RE: I think lb_factor in JK2 is broken (or just backwards from JK)
Date Fri, 09 Apr 2004 16:10:17 GMT
Yup, I think I misinterpreted what you said in the email back then.  I
wasn't able to rid myself of the assumption that jk lbfactor and jk2
lb_factor behave the same.  That assumption is now dead.  If you reply
to my email with the series of questions about this I will be happy to
do the docs.
--Angus

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mladen Turk [mailto:mturk@apache.org] 
> Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 12:07 PM
> To: 'Tomcat Developers List'
> Subject: RE: I think lb_factor in JK2 is broken (or just 
> backwards from JK)
> 
> 
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Angus Mezick
> > 
> > So, the only relationship between JK lbfactor and JK2 
> > lb_factor is in their names and the fact they have SOMETHING 
> > to do with load balancing.
> > They definetly don't seem to do the same thing. 
> 
> I gave you detailed explanation how the lb algorithm in JK2 
> works replying
> to your post on the Tomcat Users list on March 1st.
> So once again it's not percentage but rather relation between 
> lb workers.
> Remember that when lb gets reset on 255, so it's just a simple math.
> 
> 
> Perhaps we could document that better or do the math by ourself.
> 
> 
> MT.
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message