Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 72728 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2003 21:23:40 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Oct 2003 21:23:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 69137 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2003 21:23:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 69077 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2003 21:23:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 69045 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2003 21:23:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.easystreet.com) (206.26.36.40) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Oct 2003 21:23:17 -0000 Received: from apache.org (dsl-208-161-106-6.dsl.easystreet.com [208.161.106.6]) by smtp.easystreet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D1984532B for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 14:23:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3F8DBAB9.4040903@apache.org> Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 14:23:05 -0700 From: "Craig R. McClanahan" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: [5.0] System properties in server.xml (and elsewhere) References: <3F8D1EE0.3090407@fujitsu-siemens.com> <3F8D4CFC.7070104@apache.org> <3F8D543A.8010201@mail.more.net> <3F8D5878.2050208@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <3F8D5878.2050208@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Remy Maucherat wrote: > Hi, > > I think it would be possible, using a new rule, to allow system > properties inside server.xml (and possibly elsewhere) for attribute > values. This is the same as what is being done by Ant in its build > scripts. This would add an additional degree of configurability to > Tomcat. Makes sense to me. > > Actually, I wonder why this feature is not available in the digester > itself (I really got used to that feature over the years by using Ant). Because nobody ever asked, or contributed a patch to make it so :-). > > Comments ? > > Remy Craig --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org