Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 48443 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2003 08:36:21 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Oct 2003 08:36:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 87782 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2003 08:35:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 87741 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2003 08:35:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 87720 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2003 08:35:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (209.237.227.194) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Oct 2003 08:35:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 48387 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2003 08:36:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO apache.org) (127.0.0.1) by 127.0.0.1 with SMTP; 15 Oct 2003 08:36:13 -0000 Message-ID: <3F8D06F1.3050502@apache.org> Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 10:36:01 +0200 From: Remy Maucherat User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: [5] IndexOutOfBoundsException from CharChunk References: <0HMG009EGEKKLQ@mpkmail.eng.sun.com> In-Reply-To: <0HMG009EGEKKLQ@mpkmail.eng.sun.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: 127.0.0.1 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Kin-Man Chung wrote: > I don't know much about the test; it is one of stress test we have, but it > should not affect CharChunk this way, right, even if it has something > weird? Like I said, this happens only in this test, and not always > reproducible, so I am not surprised that nobody noticed it in 4.1. I > thought it might be thread related, but each thread should have its own > CharChunk instance, so I can't see how. I look into this more and report > back. Bug 23805 could be related to this, and I'm awaiting more details. At least, the offset numbers do match, which is too big a coincidence ;-) Remy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org