tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Glenn Nielsen <gl...@more.net>
Subject Re: jk2 evolution plan
Date Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:41:02 GMT
+1

I can help out.

This is a significant change for a minor revision to 2.0.4,
perhaps we should bump it to 2.1 or even 3.0?

Glenn

Henri Gomez wrote:
> Ok, about everybody seems to agree on using apr for jk2
> (still waiting Nacho for IIS).
> 
> APR side will be to :
> 
> - Update doc to indicate that APR is mandatory
> 
> - Remove #idef APR
> 
> - Use APR for all OS operation and sus will save us from
>   handling all the #include for all the diverses IO operation
>   (it's really a pain).
> 
> - For now still use_jk pool, but the version using apr_tools.
> 
> - Make socket use apr_socket for compatibility.
> 
> 
> JK to JK2 fonctionnalities backport :
> 
> - Check features added in jk and not present in jk2 (ie cping/cpong).
>   There was also some specific lb workers settings which should be
>   studied.
> 
> - After this works, make a 2.0.4 release and start extensive
>   testing.
> 
> 
> On the channel side I added a new method, hasinput which should help
> use determine if there is something to do on 'stream connections'.
> 
> For instance, it's used in jk/jk2 by the cping/cpong stage when
> connectTimeout, prepostTimeout and replyTimeout are set.
> 
> 
> And no the who's who ;)
> 
> I'd like to know who could works on jk2 evolution.
> 
> BTW, where could we find today the jk/jk2 documentation which is
> regenerated each day  ?
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message