tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henri Gomez <hgo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: jk2 evolution plan
Date Thu, 16 Oct 2003 11:00:22 GMT
jean-frederic clere wrote:

> Henri Gomez wrote:
> 
>> Ok, about everybody seems to agree on using apr for jk2
>> (still waiting Nacho for IIS).
>>
>> APR side will be to :
>>
>> - Update doc to indicate that APR is mandatory
>>
>> - Remove #idef APR
>>
>> - Use APR for all OS operation and sus will save us from
>>   handling all the #include for all the diverses IO operation
>>   (it's really a pain).
>>
>> - For now still use_jk pool, but the version using apr_tools.
>>
>> - Make socket use apr_socket for compatibility.
>>
>>
>> JK to JK2 fonctionnalities backport :
>>
>> - Check features added in jk and not present in jk2 (ie cping/cpong).
>>   There was also some specific lb workers settings which should be
>>   studied.
>>
>> - After this works, make a 2.0.4 release and start extensive
>>   testing.
>>
>>
>> On the channel side I added a new method, hasinput which should help
>> use determine if there is something to do on 'stream connections'.
>>
>> For instance, it's used in jk/jk2 by the cping/cpong stage when
>> connectTimeout, prepostTimeout and replyTimeout are set.
>>
>>
>> And no the who's who ;)
>>
>> I'd like to know who could works on jk2 evolution.
>>
>> BTW, where could we find today the jk/jk2 documentation which is
>> regenerated each day  ?
> 
> 
> I used to generate it every night but I have stopped doing the generation.
> Should I activate my cronjob again?

Yes please, but we should find a stable place (where ?)


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message