tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henri Gomez <hgo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: jk2 evolution plan
Date Thu, 16 Oct 2003 09:21:47 GMT
Mladen Turk wrote:
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Henri Gomez
>>
>>Ok, about everybody seems to agree on using apr for jk2
>>(still waiting Nacho for IIS).
>>
> 
> 
> IIS uses APR by default (staticaly linked) for a long time.
> 
> 
> 
>>APR side will be to :
>>
>>- Update doc to indicate that APR is mandatory
>>
>>- Remove #idef APR
>>
>>- Use APR for all OS operation and sus will save us from
>>   handling all the #include for all the diverses IO operation
>>   (it's really a pain).
>>
>>- For now still use_jk pool, but the version using apr_tools.
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>- Make socket use apr_socket for compatibility.
>>
> 
> 
> Why? 
> Just rename
>   env->registerFactory( env, "channel.socket",
> jk2_channel_socket_factory );
> to
>   env->registerFactory( env,
> "channel.socket",jk2_channel_apr_socket_factory ); 
> 
> and drop the socket channel.

Exactly ...

> 
> 
> 
>>And no the who's who ;)
>>
>>I'd like to know who could works on jk2 evolution.
>>
> 
> 
> +1

Thanks.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message