tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mladen Turk" <mt...@apache.org>
Subject RE: jk2 evolution plan
Date Thu, 16 Oct 2003 09:06:37 GMT


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henri Gomez
> 
> Ok, about everybody seems to agree on using apr for jk2
> (still waiting Nacho for IIS).
> 

IIS uses APR by default (staticaly linked) for a long time.


> APR side will be to :
> 
> - Update doc to indicate that APR is mandatory
> 
> - Remove #idef APR
> 
> - Use APR for all OS operation and sus will save us from
>    handling all the #include for all the diverses IO operation
>    (it's really a pain).
> 
> - For now still use_jk pool, but the version using apr_tools.
> 



> - Make socket use apr_socket for compatibility.
> 

Why? 
Just rename
  env->registerFactory( env, "channel.socket",
jk2_channel_socket_factory );
to
  env->registerFactory( env,
"channel.socket",jk2_channel_apr_socket_factory ); 

and drop the socket channel.



> 
> And no the who's who ;)
> 
> I'd like to know who could works on jk2 evolution.
> 

+1


MT.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message