Return-Path: <hgomez@apache.org>
Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 38622 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2003 17:11:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (209.237.227.194)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Aug 2003 17:11:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 71509 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2003 15:21:52 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO apache.org) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 26 Aug 2003 15:21:52 -0000
Message-ID: <3F4B7B64.3090604@apache.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 17:23:16 +0200
From: Henri Gomez <hgomez@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; fr-FR;
 rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624
X-Accept-Language: fr, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tomcat Developers List <tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release mod_jk 1.2.5
References: <3F2A435F.4090407@mail.more.net> <3F4680F7.308@selectacast.net>
In-Reply-To: <3F4680F7.308@selectacast.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Rating: localhost 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Joseph Shraibman a �crit :
> Glenn Nielsen wrote:
> 
>> No problems have been reported since the last test source distribution
>> of mod_jk 1.2.5 was made available for testing July 26.
>>
>> <ballot>
>> Please vote on a release of mod_jk 1.2.5:
>>
>> [ ] +1 release, and I will help build binaries for _________ os/web 
>> server
>> [ ] +0 ok to release
>> [ ] -0 release, but I still have a problem with _____
>> [ ] -1 don't release, there is a problem with _____
>> </ballot>
>>
>> The votes will be counted Monday August 4 and the source dist
>> release made if the vote passes.
> 
> 
> So whatever happened?  Why wasn't 1.2.5 released?

Glenn could you tag jk (with my latest jk_connect.c patch) for jk 1.2.5
and make the release ?

It will make jk compatible with OpenBSD/64