Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Message-ID: <3F37C5F7.5000001@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 18:36:07 +0200
From: Remy Maucherat <remm@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tomcat Developers List <tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Subject: [VOTE] 5.0.7 stability rating
References: <200308111211.h7BCBdP15963@kiku.7777.net>
In-Reply-To: <200308111211.h7BCBdP15963@kiku.7777.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<ballot>
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
</ballot>

<plea>Please vote :)</plea>

Add comments if needed.

Note 1: A note will be added about the need to disable smap generation 
in case of an error in SmapStratum during compilation. Other than this 
problem, I believe this build to be of good overall quality.

Note 2: As far as I am concerned, the 5.0.7 build is feature complete 
(ie, my TODO list is empty). I will now focus on tweaks and bugs. This 
probably means a slower release cycle (assuming this build is voted as 
beta). If anyone has ideas about new items, I think it's safe to say 
it's now or never (at least for the initial 5.0.x release) ;-)

Note 3: I'll be away with little internet connectivity between 08/13 and 
08/19 (included). If this vote could be wrapped up *before* I leave, it 
would be good, but it's not essential, so I don't want people to rush 
and skimp on testing (changing 5.0.7 from alpha to beta and making the 
necessary announcements should be simple enough).

Note 4: 4.1.x went to beta at 4.1.7 (5.0.x's codebase was then created 
from that tag). It is an interesting coincidence. However, I feel like 
5.0.x is considerably more stable than 4.1.x was at this stage (not very 
surprising, with brand new connectors and rewritten Jasper for 4.1.x), 
and I don't feel any particular urge to create a branch either ;-)

Remy