Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 37665 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2003 09:00:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (209.237.227.194) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Aug 2003 09:00:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 2161 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2003 09:00:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO apache.org) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Aug 2003 09:00:49 -0000 Message-ID: <3F34B82D.8030201@apache.org> Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2003 11:00:29 +0200 From: Remy Maucherat User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: [5.0.7] New build by Sunday References: <20030807155733.28217.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org> <3F328D0D.4030609@apache.org> <3F335836.6010605@apache.org> <01d801c35e0f$0c5ba980$ec66a8c0@bbarkerxp> In-Reply-To: <01d801c35e0f$0c5ba980$ec66a8c0@bbarkerxp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: localhost 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Bill Barker wrote: >>All the bugs so far are with the (brand new) procrun for NT. Bugs 18220, >>21279 (IMO, to make things more reliable and keep it simple, procrun >>should wait for the child VM to die before stopping everything, rather >>than simply waiting until the stop method returns), 22174. >>5.0.8 is good enough :) > > It turns out that I had a bit of spare time this afternoon to look at this. > I can give you a tomcat(w) that fixes 21279 and 22174. The binaries will be Great :) > for my code, since I don't have CVS access here, and don't feel like doing > the merge with JFC's commit manually. I'm confused. I saw your commits and new binaries. What's missing ? Thanks, Remy