Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 69071 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2003 18:55:43 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2003 18:55:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 27275 invoked by uid 97); 17 Jul 2003 18:58:18 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-dev@nagoya.betaversion.org Received: (qmail 27268 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2003 18:58:17 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by nagoya.betaversion.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2003 18:58:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 68098 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2003 18:55:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 68084 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2003 18:55:29 -0000 Received: from sense-sea-megasub-1-507.oz.net (HELO rhombus.znep.com) (216.39.145.253) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2003 18:55:29 -0000 Received: by rhombus.znep.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 17C361A349; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 11:55:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rhombus.znep.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F4BF1AAA5 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 11:55:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 11:55:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Marc Slemko To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: URI Space and smarter hand off between Apache/Tomcat In-Reply-To: <20030717184820.633.qmail@web40406.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: References: <20030717184820.633.qmail@web40406.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, P. Brewer wrote: > I found the following thread from a year ago: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-dev&m=102815260317741&w=2\ > > Basiclly discussing a JkNotMount for excluding images and other > static content from being passed to Tomcat. I can't tell that > anythin was done. > > Was it shot down for a technical reason? Just didn't get implmented? > Or is implemented and not documented? I can help with C code, but > probably not much help with Java code. You would probably be better off to just make mod_jk* properly support Apache (and other webserver) configuration directives such as Directory and Files, then use them to control what gets passed on to tomcat. Having mod_jk trying to do parsing based on filenames on disk is a very bad idea for performance and security reasons, especially on win32 platforms. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org