From tomcat-dev-return-31236-qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-dev=nagoya.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org Tue Jul 01 13:26:33 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 17591 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2003 13:26:33 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2003 13:26:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 9625 invoked by uid 97); 1 Jul 2003 13:28:57 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-dev@nagoya.betaversion.org Received: (qmail 9618 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2003 13:28:56 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by nagoya.betaversion.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2003 13:28:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 13808 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2003 13:25:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 11078 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2003 13:24:12 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2003 13:24:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 9573 invoked by uid 50); 1 Jul 2003 13:26:36 -0000 Date: 1 Jul 2003 13:26:36 -0000 Message-ID: <20030701132636.9572.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Cc: Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21206] - Tomcat 5 - Jetspeed JSP Portlets do not display X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206 Tomcat 5 - Jetspeed JSP Portlets do not display ------- Additional Comments From remm@apache.org 2003-07-01 13:26 ------- I have no idea if it's indeed a Jetspeed bug. I'd like to know if it can be reproduced using something other than Jetspeed (in which case it could indicate a buffering or RD bug). At this point, I don't feel like digging into Jetspeed to get the answer ... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org