Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 86671 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2003 16:15:54 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Apr 2003 16:15:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 18215 invoked by uid 97); 28 Apr 2003 16:17:55 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-dev@nagoya.betaversion.org Received: (qmail 18207 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2003 16:17:55 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by nagoya.betaversion.org with SMTP; 28 Apr 2003 16:17:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 85570 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2003 16:15:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 85544 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2003 16:15:40 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Apr 2003 16:15:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 18193 invoked by uid 50); 28 Apr 2003 16:17:42 -0000 Date: 28 Apr 2003 16:17:42 -0000 Message-ID: <20030428161742.18192.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Cc: Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19336] - jk2 crashes jvm (and tomcat) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19336 jk2 crashes jvm (and tomcat) ------- Additional Comments From funkman@joedog.org 2003-04-28 16:17 ------- I found it interesting that "org.apache.jk.apr.AprImpl.createJkHandler(Native Method)" caused the error (according to the trace) and createJkHandler is part of the JNI connector code. (jk_jni_aprImpl.c??) Which sounds like a jk issue, not a JVM issue. Since I don't know enough about JK2 - I can't offer debug advice, or any kind of patch :( and I won't reopen the bug. (Since I'd be part more of a problem, and not a solution just ranting like a nut) My 0.02. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org