Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 62949 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2002 16:38:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Dec 2002 16:38:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 12144 invoked by uid 97); 7 Dec 2002 16:39:16 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 12128 invoked by uid 97); 7 Dec 2002 16:39:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 12116 invoked by uid 98); 7 Dec 2002 16:39:15 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Path: not-for-mail From: Costin Manolache Subject: Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2002 08:32:19 -0800 Lines: 32 Message-ID: References: <3DF20EE5.4040906@apache.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: 63-203-204-149.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1039279081 5677 63.203.204.149 (7 Dec 2002 16:38:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 16:38:01 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: KNode/0.7.1 Sender: news X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Remy Maucherat wrote: > - As the release manager, I feel lazy, and would like to minimize the > possibilities of screwing up a distribution You don't have to do that - one of the people who voted +1 will have to volunteer as release manager for that release, and they are supposed to maintain it. > - If we follow Costin's ideas on bundling, full-tomcat will bundle lots > of projects; we can also bundle Velocity here (probably on the condition > that it moves to commons-logging, to harmonize dependencies) It seems Jon is more interested in a release without jsp then in a release that includes velocity. Too bad. > Personally, I think this is a yes or no vote, so I don't think either > choice needs a justification. The "majority" decision works only if enough people vote. So far we have: +1: Jon, Pier, Bill -0: Costin -1: Remy Anyone else ? Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: