Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 20530 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2002 16:02:13 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Dec 2002 16:02:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 14208 invoked by uid 97); 19 Dec 2002 16:03:19 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 14149 invoked by uid 97); 19 Dec 2002 16:03:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 14124 invoked by uid 98); 19 Dec 2002 16:03:17 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: RE: error-page status codes broken, no response to bugzilla report MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 16:02:32 -0000 Message-ID: <5F459C4A45AAE7469BC1DAD5750343216D9B@SPUD.salad.taglab.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: error-page status codes broken, no response to bugzilla report Thread-Index: AcKnd3EhPCRdWEAsTI2BvqzOXmdXNQAAC+DA From: "Martin Algesten" To: "Tomcat Developers List" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N The problem with this bug is that there are people here who don't agree it is a bug... which is just plain ignorant and stupid... THIS IS A BUG....IT NEEDS FIXING! I've tried get this one sorted as well... however, either someone will tell you they don't agree it is a bug and/or they will just ignore you until you go away. Martin > -----Original Message----- > From: Donald Ball [mailto:dball@rhoworld.com]=20 > Sent: 19 December 2002 15:55 > To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org > Subject: Fwd: error-page status codes broken, no response to=20 > bugzilla report >=20 >=20 > What does one have to do to get a response to a bug report=20 > around here? I submitted it to bugzilla, I followed up here.=20 > If it's a bug, I'm happy to help patch. If I'm an idiot, I'd=20 > appreciate being told so. >=20 > - donald >=20 > On 12/18/2002 at 1:00 PM Donald Ball wrote: >=20 > >I submitted this bug report a few days ago: > > > >http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D15406 > > > >It seems to me that tomcat is doing the wrong thing when it tags the=20 > >error page contents with status code 200 instead of the actual error=20 > >status > code. > >If this is the case, is anyone interested in fixing tomcat?=20 > If this is=20 > >not the case, can someone try to explain why tomcat's behavior is=20 > >correct? > > > >- donald >=20 >=20 > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: =20 > unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org> > For=20 > additional commands,=20 > e-mail: >=20 >=20 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: