Return-Path: 
 <tomcat-dev-return-22756-qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-dev=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@apache.org
Received: (qmail 53447 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2002 08:15:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Dec 2002 08:15:34 -0000
Received: (qmail 18468 invoked by uid 97); 9 Dec 2002 08:16:43 -0000
Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 18452 invoked by uid 97); 9 Dec 2002 08:16:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tomcat-dev-subscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" <tomcat-dev.jakarta.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" <tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 18438 invoked by uid 98); 9 Dec 2002 08:16:42 -0000
X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002)
Message-ID: <008d01c29f5c$2bd85280$d2b32b04@dslverizon.net>
From: "Bill Barker" <wbarker@wilshire.com>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
References: <3DF41513.8050400@apache.org> <BA197C14.46D64%jon@latchkey.com>
 <at1hda$gha$1@main.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 00:22:53 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
X-Archived: msg.XXplyqFa@sneezy
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.11 (www dot roaringpenguin dot com slash
 mimedefang)
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

I agree with Costin's interpretation of the Jakarta voting rules (even if I
don't agree with his "-0" on this particular vote :).  Since it is a
"majority vote", justifying a "-1" is optional.

<soapbox>
I'd like to point out that we have at least 3 non-binding +1 votes on this
already.  It seems that there is a community out there for a Servlet-only
release, and IMHO, we should listen to them.
</soapbox>


----- Original Message -----
From: "Costin Manolache" <cmanolache@yahoo.com>
To: <tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2002 11:32 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution


> Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
>
>
> > requirement in JSR 154 to provide the Admin Tool, I don't see how your
> > argument is valid for what I'm proposing.
>
> A majority vote doesn't require arguments or validity of arguments.
>
> "I like the idea" or "I don't like the idea" is all that's needed.
>
> Valid arguments are required for a veto.
>
> I don't think it would be good for tomcat community if it will pass with 3
> +1 votes, 2 -1 votes and one -0.
>
> I hope that more tomcat committers will send at least a +0 or -0, and even
> better +1 or -1. There is no need to get into too much debate - just yes
> and no would help.
>
>
>
> Costin
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>