Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 65426 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2002 21:27:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Nov 2002 21:27:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 29235 invoked by uid 97); 7 Nov 2002 21:28:08 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 29112 invoked by uid 97); 7 Nov 2002 21:28:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 28982 invoked by uid 98); 7 Nov 2002 21:28:04 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) X-Sent: 7 Nov 2002 21:26:44 GMT From: "Keith Wannamaker" To: "Tomcat Developers List" Subject: RE: Coyote/Http11 under load Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 16:30:43 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 In-Reply-To: <3DCA149A.7030408@apache.org> X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N The numbers were suspect because I was running 3.3 under JBuilder but 4.0 externally, I'd imagine. I set up clean tomcat trees and ran them outside of any test environment and I get these numbers: (100 rqs/10 concurrent cx) TC 4.0.6 | TC 3.3.2 Http11 Http10 | Http11 Http10 | Rq/sec 26.9 25.89 | 18 27 kb/sec 393 377 | 266 404 Coyote/11 with Tomcat 3.3 is still a dog. I would imagine you'd get the similar numbers with any servlet as I changed nothing but the servlet container between the tests. I'm still investigating, but it may be easier for us to move to 4.0. Keith | -----Original Message----- | From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:remm@apache.org] | Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 2:22 AM | To: Tomcat Developers List | Subject: Re: Coyote/Http11 under load | | | Keith Wannamaker wrote: | | > Same box, same app, same test, with Tomcat 4.0.6's http10 and 11 adaptor: | > | > coyote/http11 37rq/sec, 406kb/sec | > http10 30rq/sec, 181kb/sec | > | > I've always held that 3.3 was more "lean and mean" than 4.0 but | > now I'm wondering if this is just indicating some basic architectural | > differences. | | I don't understand those numbers. Even the two above (how can there be | twice the bandwidth with only 20% more requests if the bench is correct ?). | I thought 3.3 + Coyote HTTP/1.1 was as fast as the default HTTP/1.0. | | Remy | | > | > Keith | > | > | -----Original Message----- | > | Subject: Coyote/Http11 under load | > | | > | | > | I'm using http11 on a busy site with more or less Tomcat 3.3 head | > | (3.3.2-dev). | > | | > | coyote/http11 4.2rq/sec, 63kb/sec | > | http10 6.3rq/sec, 92kb/sec | | -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: