tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bill Barker" <wbar...@wilshire.com>
Subject Re: Optimizing Coyote
Date Mon, 25 Nov 2002 21:14:02 GMT
At least with the Solaris TCP stack, the SoTimeouts make no difference at
all to the 'ab' times.  However, it's easy enough to make it a configuration
option.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Barker" <wbarker@wilshire.com>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 11:54 AM
Subject: Re: Optimizing Coyote


> I'm surprised at the expense:  I had thought that this should be little
more
> than setting a note in the O/S kernel.  It's also pretty much what
> Apache/httpd 2.0 does, at least last time I looked.
>
> However, I'll take another look at them.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Remy Maucherat" <remm@apache.org>
> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 1:58 AM
> Subject: Optimizing Coyote
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Many optimizations in Coyote HTTP/1.1 are quite straightforward, but
> > some others are more difficult.
> >
> > Right now, I'm "stuck" trying to optimize the amount of get/setSoTimeout
> > method calls. Each of them is relatively expensive, and probably ends up
> > exercizing the network stack more than we would like. I will try to
> > experiment and commit things. Can you review them Bill ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Remy
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> >
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message