tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pier Fumagalli <p...@betaversion.org>
Subject Re: production quality?
Date Thu, 31 Oct 2002 17:18:12 GMT
On 31/10/02 14:36 "Martin Algesten" <martin@taglab.com> wrote:

> 1. Tomcat should either not send any headers on a 304, or if it does
> then make sure that they do reflect the correct values for the requested
> object (e.g. not call a gif a text).
> 
> 2. Not entirely sure here. Reading the HTTP/1.1
> http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html#sec10.3.5
> It states:
> "If a cache uses a received 304 response to update a cache entry, the
> cache MUST update the entry to reflect any new field values given in the
> response."
> 
> I suspect that is what we're seeing in mod_proxy. But I just realised
> that I have some reading to do, the stuff about weak and strong
> validator didn't make much sense to me...

I too believe that mod_proxy is behaving quite correctly according to the
spec... Tomcat should not send those headers... It will also impact client
(browser) caches, not only mod_proxy...

    Pier


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message