tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mladen Turk" <>
Subject RE: [VOTE] JK2 2.1
Date Tue, 01 Oct 2002 12:09:37 GMT

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henri Gomez
> We speaked about use of APR in JK2 many times in the past, 
> take a look 
> at tomcat-dev mailing list archive.

Know that, but often people change opinions, you cannot blame to
occasionally put that back on ;)

> Making APR mandatory for JK2 was never planned for 2.0 but for 2.1, 
> which will be a whole different story.
> > Would It be such a big step forward to open a new branch, I don't 
> > think so.
> It's really a nightmare to manage 2 differents branches at 
> the same time 

Think you miss me. Things like using APR as mandatory reflects only the
build procedure, and IMO doesn't require a new branch. I even didn't
think that 2.1 needs to be a new branch (3.0 perhaps).
The new branch needs to be technologically different to be a new branch
thought, and see no reason why the 2.0.3 wouldn't be with the APR
boundled in.
But if the rest of community think it does, I'll 'Adopt'.
> I wonder what's the problem using #idef HAVE_APR in JK2 today ?

None really (except that its messy), but you can find things like that
even inside the code that can be used only in the APR supported
But, as I said, I can Adopt ;)


To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
For additional commands, e-mail: <>

View raw message