Return-Path: 
 <tomcat-dev-return-17409-qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-dev=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@apache.org
Received: (qmail 46220 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2002 16:19:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Sep 2002 16:19:24 -0000
Received: (qmail 24514 invoked by uid 97); 4 Sep 2002 16:19:51 -0000
Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 24478 invoked by uid 97); 4 Sep 2002 16:19:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tomcat-dev-subscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" <tomcat-dev.jakarta.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" <tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 24466 invoked by uid 98); 4 Sep 2002 16:19:50 -0000
X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002)
Message-ID: <6268A153029CD611A4570010B556D42011B2A0@ukexch1.globeop.com>
From: Richard Atkinson <ratkinso@globeop.com>
To: 'Tomcat Developers List' <tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Subject: RE: [4.1.10] Stability rating
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 12:17:56 -0400 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N


<ballot>
[ ] Alpha
[X] Beta
[ ] Stable
</ballot>

I only just installed 4.1.10 today.  I hit a lot of problems with my
existing
apps that run fine on 4.0.3 because of this bug with jsp:param tags.  Having
a 
null value for a jsp:param value causes a NullPointerException.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10671

4.1.10 is apparently spec non-compliant on this and I think this would
impact
a lot of people trying to upgrade if it goes stable.  Sorry Remy, I know you
are pushing hard to get 4.1.x out of the door, but I do think this is
important.

Regards,
Richard...


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:remm@apache.org]
> Sent: 04 September 2002 09:59
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: [4.1.10] Stability rating
> 
> I think milestone 4.1.10 is of good quality and we can consider
> releasing it as the first stable release in the 4.1.x line.
> 
> <ballot>
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] Stable
> </ballot>
> 
> If not voting stable, please suggest if possible a list of items which
> should be addressed before a milestone can be released as stable.
> This vote will run until early friday, and the release announcement will
> be made at that time if the release is rated "beta" or "stable".
> 
> Remy


----------------------------------------------------
This email with all information contained herein or attached hereto may
contain confidential and/or privileged information intended for the
addressee(s) only.  If you have received this email in error, please contact
the sender and immediately delete this email in its entirety and any
attachments thereto.



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>