Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 78151 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2002 14:14:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Aug 2002 14:14:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 8085 invoked by uid 97); 1 Aug 2002 14:13:55 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 7965 invoked by uid 97); 1 Aug 2002 14:13:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 7942 invoked by uid 98); 1 Aug 2002 14:13:53 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4198 created Apr 24 2002) X-Authentication-Warning: costinm.sfo.covalent.net: costin owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 07:10:09 -0700 (PDT) From: costinm@covalent.net X-X-Sender: costin@costinm.sfo.covalent.net To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: New coyote branch In-Reply-To: <20020801020920.85653.qmail@web20202.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Peter Lin wrote: > Justyna Horwat wrote:I looked in jakarta-tomcat-connectors and it doesn't look like > jakarta-tomcat-connectors has been branched yet. I checked the archives > and saw the vote results where it was decided that the HEAD of > jakarta-tomcat-connectors will be used for Tomcat 5 and Coyote 1.0 would > be branched. > > I'd like to request that this branch be created. Remy? > > The reason I ask is that I'm working on a servlet 2.4 servlet request > events implementation which involves modifying CoyoteRequest.java. What kind of changes ? Coyote should be independent of servlet, if you need to add something you can add it to the main branch. 2.4 should be backward compatible - so it shouldn't change any behavior. Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: