Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 1402 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2002 13:51:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2002 13:51:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 13676 invoked by uid 97); 11 Jul 2002 13:51:40 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 13654 invoked by uid 97); 11 Jul 2002 13:51:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 13581 invoked by uid 98); 11 Jul 2002 13:51:38 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4198 created Apr 24 2002) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: OFF TOPIC: RE: [5.0] [VOTE] New branches and repositories Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:51:14 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <28F05913385EAC43AF019413F674A01702CFCD73@OCCLUST04EVS1.ugd.att.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [5.0] [VOTE] New branches and repositories Thread-Index: AcIo4E09er9A1yQWRhOSV1Isr/EAswAANscQ From: "Marx, Mitchell E (Mitch), ALCNS" To: "Tomcat Developers List" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N As a lay person trying to learn, can I ask a question about the benefits of repository vs branch? =20 Since I haven't really used CVS, I don't know the +/-, but would have proposed: > A) Servlet 2.4 & JSP 2.0 API Use new jakarta-servletapi-5.0 =20 > B) Catalina 2.0 Use new jakarta-tomcat-catalina-2.0 > C) Coyote 2.0 use new jakarta-tomcat-connectors-2.0 =20 > D) Tomcat 5.0 Use new jakarta-tomcat-5.0 > E) Jasper 2.0 use new jakarta-tomcat-jasper-2.0 Which would seem more consistent, for someone just trying to dip in for the first time. =20 Mitchell Evan Marx mmarx@att.com AT&T IP Network Configuration & Provisioning Development -----Original Message----- From: costinm@covalent.net [mailto:costinm@covalent.net] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 9:37 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: [5.0] [VOTE] New branches and repositories On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > >=20 > A) Servlet 2.4 & JSP 2.0 API > 1. [X] Use new jakarta-servletapi-5 > 2. [ ] Use the HEAD of jakarta-servletapi > 3. [ ] Other: =20 > B) Catalina 2.0 > 1. [X] Use new jakarta-tomcat-catalina > 2. [ ] Use new jakarta-tomcat-5.0 > 3. [ ] Use the HEAD of jakarta-tomcat-4.0 > 4. [ ] Other: > C) Coyote 2.0 > 1. [X] Yes, use the HEAD of jakarta-tomcat-connectors > 2. [ ] No, use: =20 > D) Tomcat 5.0 > 1. [X] Use new jakarta-tomcat-5.0 > 2. [ ] Use the HEAD of jakarta-tomcat-4.0 > 3. [ ] Use the HEAD of jakarta-tomcat > 4. [ ] Other: That's a hard one...=20 I would like it to go in jakarta-tomcat, but the current CVS organization is a mess and would create more problems.=20 I'm actually more on jakarta-tomcat-5 ( without the .0 - since 5.1 will be in this CVS too ) > E) Jasper 2.0 > 1. [X] Yes, use the HEAD of jakarta-tomcat-jasper > 2. [ ] No, use: >=20 > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: