Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 12112 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2002 14:20:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jun 2002 14:20:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 29388 invoked by uid 97); 19 Jun 2002 14:20:08 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 29369 invoked by uid 97); 19 Jun 2002 14:20:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 29357 invoked by uid 98); 19 Jun 2002 14:20:07 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4198 created Apr 24 2002) X-Authentication-Warning: costinm.sfo.covalent.net: costin owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 07:19:06 -0700 (PDT) From: costinm@covalent.net X-X-Sender: costin@costinm.sfo.covalent.net To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: RE: index.*: mod_jk 1.2.0 vs. Apache 2.0.36 In-Reply-To: <1024476613.8342.109.camel@beast.rexursive.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Do you have a "DirectoryIndex" directive ? Costin On 19 Jun 2002, Bojan Smojver wrote: > On Wed, 2002-06-19 at 18:45, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > > Hum, I think the problem should be easier to detect (I hope so) > > Yeah, I agree. I actually think that my configuration could be screwed > somewhere, somehow (although I don't see how) because almost all Apache > 2.0.x/Tomcat 3.3.x users would run into this kind of problem... > > Bojan > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > For additional commands, e-mail: > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: