Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 78681 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2002 08:22:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jun 2002 08:22:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 14420 invoked by uid 97); 19 Jun 2002 08:22:53 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 14404 invoked by uid 97); 19 Jun 2002 08:22:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 14392 invoked by uid 98); 19 Jun 2002 08:22:52 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4198 created Apr 24 2002) content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: index.*: mod_jk 1.2.0 vs. Apache 2.0.36 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 10:23:08 +0200 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: index.*: mod_jk 1.2.0 vs. Apache 2.0.36 Thread-Index: AcIXHk9VTQDLELPTRhmFTViHrruA9wATB4bw From: "GOMEZ Henri" To: "Tomcat Developers List" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N The question is : What should do http server ? forward to tomcat /index.jsp and if it fail, try next to forward /index.vm ? - Henri Gomez ___[_]____ EMAIL : hgomez@slib.fr (. .) =20 PGP KEY : 697ECEDD ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6=20 >-----Original Message----- >From: Bojan Smojver [mailto:bojan@rexursive.com] >Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 1:19 AM >To: Tomcat Dev List >Subject: RE: index.*: mod_jk 1.2.0 vs. Apache 2.0.36 > > >It doesn't work in either case. In this case it should be index.vm, >since that's the file that exists in the directory. > >Bojan > >On Tue, 2002-06-18 at 19:58, GOMEZ Henri wrote: >> question. >>=20 >> Should mod_jk forward to tomcat index.jsp or index.vm ? >>=20 >> - >> Henri Gomez ___[_]____ >> EMAIL : hgomez@slib.fr (. .) =20 >> PGP KEY : 697ECEDD ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... >> PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: Bojan Smojver [mailto:bojan@rexursive.com] >> >Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 1:11 PM >> >To: Tomcat Dev List >> >Subject: index.*: mod_jk 1.2.0 vs. Apache 2.0.36 >> > >> > >> >I've submitted a bug regarding this (9913) since it still=20 >appears to be >> >there in the above combo. >> > >> >This should be very simple to test (you just whack an index.jsp in a >> >directory), so if someone can confirm that my configuration is >> >brain-dead (because this is such an unlikely bug :-), that would be >> >nice. >> > >> >Bojan >> > >> > >> >-- >> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: =20 >> > >> >For additional commands, e-mail:=20 >> > >> > >> > >>=20 >> -- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: =20 > For additional commands, e-mail: = >=20 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: = For additional commands, e-mail: = -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: