Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 97275 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2002 09:28:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jun 2002 09:28:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 27037 invoked by uid 97); 20 Jun 2002 09:28:30 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 27021 invoked by uid 97); 20 Jun 2002 09:28:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 27007 invoked by uid 50); 20 Jun 2002 09:28:29 -0000 Date: 20 Jun 2002 09:28:29 -0000 Message-ID: <20020620092829.27006.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Cc: Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10048] - JSP forward removes ALL response wrappers X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10048 JSP forward removes ALL response wrappers ------- Additional Comments From remm@apache.org 2002-06-20 09:28 ------- Doing what you propose seems reasonable. I'll commit the patch to Jasper 2 and see if there are people who think it is a bad idea. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: