tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "GOMEZ Henri" <hgo...@slib.fr>
Subject RE: mod_jk cache and socket timeout
Date Mon, 24 Jun 2002 12:20:30 GMT
>Henri thinks we should discuss that here, so I'm forwarding 
>the original mail.

Sure that's OSS way ;)

>Basically I don't like the time. The alternative is to use something
>like GetTickCount().

there is no gettickcount under Unix, but you could use gettickcount on
WIN32 if it's faster.

>The patch uses the semi-dynamic endpoint cache. One should set the high
>enough worker.cachesize, and the number of opened channels will drop
>after worker.cache_timeout.

Tell use more about worker.cache_timeout.

>Since IMO there was the general +1 for Jan's patch, here is 
>the original
>with added endpoint timeout.

time_t now = time(NULL);

Is there faster alternative in apache ? time() is a consuming
call, and I recall hack from a SGI boy to speed Apache 1.3
in avoiding use of time(), which are also in request_rec (r->request_time)
in apache 1.3 (time_t) and 2.0 (apr_time_t)

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mladen Turk [mailto:mturk@mappingsoft.com] 
>> Sent: 22. lipanj 2002 18:06
>> To: GOMEZ Henri
>> Subject: mod_jk cache and socket timeout
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Henri,
>>  
>> Here is the Jan Singer's socket timeout patch with added 
>> cache timeout (since its not in the tree already). Still 
>> don't like the time() difftime, but it'll do.
>> 
>> Added workers.cache_timeout (defaults to 15 secs).
>> 
>> With high cachesize, Apache 2.0.40-dev/TC 4.1.5 XP/WIN2K 
>> behaves perfectly. Done the test on 4x1.6GHz PIII Xeon and 
>it flies...
>> 
>> 
>> Greetings,
>> MT.
>> 
>

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message