tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "GOMEZ Henri" <hgo...@slib.fr>
Subject RE: mod_jk testing (WAS RE: mod_jk 1.2.0 workers pool)
Date Fri, 21 Jun 2002 15:30:46 GMT
Ok so mod_jk 1.2.0 seems to be stable also on IIS.

Good news.

-
Henri Gomez                 ___[_]____
EMAIL : hgomez@slib.fr        (. .)                     
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD    ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 



>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ignacio J. Ortega [mailto:nacho@siapi.es]
>Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 5:27 PM
>To: 'Mladen Turk'; 'Tomcat Developers List'
>Cc: 'nacho@apache.org'; GOMEZ Henri
>Subject: RE: mod_jk testing (WAS RE: mod_jk 1.2.0 workers pool)
>
>
>Ahhh, finally got to do the test on a capable machine, but very
>overloaded with some db procecesses, dont take anything from the
>absolute timing i know are very bad.., 
>
>For all the other, my test seem ok..
>
>
>Server Software:        Microsoft-IIS/5.0
>Server Hostname:        ciberlogic
>Server Port:            80
>
>Document Path:          /examples/jsp/snp/snoop.jsp
>Document Length:        713 bytes
>
>Concurrency Level:      200
>Time taken for tests:   39.937500 seconds
>Complete requests:      10000
>Failed requests:        0
>Write errors:           0
>Total transferred:      8909265 bytes
>HTML transferred:       7130000 bytes
>Requests per second:    250.39 [#/sec] (mean)
>Time per request:       798.750 [ms] (mean)
>Time per request:       3.994 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent
>requests)
>Transfer rate:          217.84 [Kbytes/sec] received
>
>Connection Times (ms)
>              min  mean[+/-sd] median   max
>Connect:        0    1   5.8      0     281
>Processing:    78  791 4566.9    250   39718
>Waiting:       15  766 4568.4    250   39718
>Total:         78  792 4566.9    250   39718
>
>Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
>  50%    250
>  66%    265
>  75%    265
>  80%    281
>  90%    312
>  95%    453
>  98%    812
>  99%  39656
> 100%  39718 (longest request)
>
>Saludos ,
>Ignacio J. Ortega
>
>
>> -----Mensaje original-----
>> De: Mladen Turk [mailto:mturk@mappingsoft.com]
>> Enviado el: 21 de junio de 2002 8:19
>> Para: 'Tomcat Developers List'
>> Cc: nacho@apache.org; GOMEZ Henri
>> Asunto: mod_jk testing (WAS RE: mod_jk 1.2.0 workers pool)
>> Importancia: Alta
>> 
>> 
>> First some things about testing:
>> 
>> DO NOT USE the date.jsp (it could return various html 
>lengths, so from
>> there are coming those Failed requests ).
>> I've just browsed through the source code of ab and it uses the first
>> page as its length ethalon, and date.jsp could retur various 
>length if
>> the tests are finishing on the single second interval so 
>> there is 1 byte
>> html length differnce.
>> 
>> Use the /examples/jsp/snp/snoop.jsp instead (think it allways returns
>> the same content-length).
>> 
>> The ones that count are only the 'Non-2xx responses'
>> 
>> 
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Ignacio J. Ortega [mailto:nacho@siapi.es] 
>> > Sent: 20. lipanj 2002 22:37
>> > To: 'Tomcat Developers List'
>> > Subject: RE: mod_jk 1.2.0 workers pool
>> > 
>> > 
>> > > -----Mensaje original-----
>> > > De: costinm@covalent.net [mailto:costinm@covalent.net] 
>> > Enviado el: 20 
>> > > de junio de 2002 20:29
>> > 
>> > I need time to prepare a machine that can handle this level 
>> > of concurrency, Mladen used  -c 200, i need to switch to one 
>> > of the servers, :(, Thanks to microsoft, W2k professional 
>> > only can handle 10 simultaneus connections :((((..
>> >
>> It's a IIS thing I think.
>>  
>> > I think Mlanden uses XP, right? which version ? Home, 
>> > Professional? do you know the exact number of concurrent 
>> > connections the XP version you use can handle?
>> > 
>> 
>> Its Professional. And if I'm running the snoop.jsp with -c 200:
>> 
>> 181857 [Thread-4] ERROR server.JkCoyoteHandler  - Error in 
>action code
>> java.net.SocketException: Software caused connection abort: 
>> socket write
>> error
>> 
>> And,
>> 
>> 181867 [Thread-4] ERROR common.ChannelSocket  - Error, closing
>> connection
>> java.net.SocketException: Software caused connection abort: 
>> JVM_recv in
>> socket input stream read
>> 
>> Running with -c 10 doesn't produce such a error.
>> 
>> 
>> MT.
>> 
>> 
>

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message