tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "GOMEZ Henri" <hgo...@slib.fr>
Subject RE: mod_jk 1.2.0 release news
Date Thu, 20 Jun 2002 10:55:40 GMT
In fact it's not the makefile which is bad but
the way using make in jk/native works.

make goes to commons and do a make in commons
which didn't take care of CFLAGS.

then make goes in apache-2.0 and the make will
get the previously compiled commons and link
with compiled (.lo) files from apache-2.0.

The correct way should be to go in apache-2.0
and make here since all the needed CFLAGS are
available.

But the AP2 Makefile wait for .lo in ../common/

I'll correct the Makefile.in in apache-2.0 to
fix that ;)

-
Henri Gomez                 ___[_]____
EMAIL : hgomez@slib.fr        (. .)                     
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD    ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 



>-----Original Message-----
>From: GOMEZ Henri 
>Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 12:46 PM
>To: Tomcat Developers List
>Subject: RE: mod_jk 1.2.0 release news
>
>
>More problem in mod_jk 1.2.0 detected.
>
>The makefile generated in common by configure
>didn't expose APACHE2 CFLAGS and so we miss many 
>flags, including _REENTRANT.....
>
>-
>Henri Gomez                 ___[_]____
>EMAIL : hgomez@slib.fr        (. .)                     
>PGP KEY : 697ECEDD    ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
>PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Mladen Turk [mailto:mturk@mappingsoft.com]
>>Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 12:30 PM
>>To: 'Tomcat Developers List'
>>Subject: RE: mod_jk 1.2.0 release news
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:hgomez@slib.fr] 
>>> 
>>> Hum, I make a trivial test.
>>> 
>>> I tested Apache 2.0.39 (server/mpm/worker) with 
>>> ab using HTTP 2.0 static file (/index.html.fr) and
>>> got some errors log like :
>>> 
>>> [crit] the listener thread didn't exist
>>> 
>>
>>Nothing on my dors.
>>If I remember you are using RH 6.3 (thing I read there's some problems
>>with mpm/worker, but not sure)
>>
>>Anyhow, I don't think that the Apache is the bugger here.
>>
>>MT.
>>
>>
>>--
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
>><mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
>>For additional commands, e-mail: 
>><mailto:tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
>>
>>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
<mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message