tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bojan Smojver <bo...@rexursive.com>
Subject RE: index.*: mod_jk 1.2.0 vs. Apache 2.0.36
Date Wed, 19 Jun 2002 08:33:09 GMT
Yes, pretty much. I'm guessing that Apache will try it's own page types
first (index.shtml, index.html etc.) and if if doesn't find any, pass
the request to Tomcat (through mod_jk) for index.jsp and then index.vm
(in that order, since that's how it's specified in DirectoryIndex).

Just for the record, the server displayed the content of the directory
(this is on the test machine where that's allowed).

When I put explicit URL in the address field of the brower (e.g.
http://www.testsite.dev/index.vm) it does work (i.e. Tomcat picks up the
servlet that handles *.vm pages etc.).

Bojan

On Wed, 2002-06-19 at 18:23, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
> The question is :
> 
> What should do http server ?
> 
> forward to tomcat /index.jsp and if it fail, try next
> to forward /index.vm ?
> 
> -
> Henri Gomez                 ___[_]____
> EMAIL : hgomez@slib.fr        (. .)                     
> PGP KEY : 697ECEDD    ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
> PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 
> 
> 
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Bojan Smojver [mailto:bojan@rexursive.com]
> >Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 1:19 AM
> >To: Tomcat Dev List
> >Subject: RE: index.*: mod_jk 1.2.0 vs. Apache 2.0.36
> >
> >
> >It doesn't work in either case. In this case it should be index.vm,
> >since that's the file that exists in the directory.
> >
> >Bojan
> >
> >On Tue, 2002-06-18 at 19:58, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
> >> question.
> >> 
> >> Should mod_jk forward to tomcat index.jsp or index.vm ?
> >> 
> >> -
> >> Henri Gomez                 ___[_]____
> >> EMAIL : hgomez@slib.fr        (. .)                     
> >> PGP KEY : 697ECEDD    ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
> >> PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> >-----Original Message-----
> >> >From: Bojan Smojver [mailto:bojan@rexursive.com]
> >> >Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 1:11 PM
> >> >To: Tomcat Dev List
> >> >Subject: index.*: mod_jk 1.2.0 vs. Apache 2.0.36
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >I've submitted a bug regarding this (9913) since it still 
> >appears to be
> >> >there in the above combo.
> >> >
> >> >This should be very simple to test (you just whack an index.jsp in a
> >> >directory), so if someone can confirm that my configuration is
> >> >brain-dead (because this is such an unlikely bug :-), that would be
> >> >nice.
> >> >
> >> >Bojan
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> >> ><mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> >> >For additional commands, e-mail: 
> >> ><mailto:tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> 
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> 



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message