Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 82440 invoked from network); 25 May 2002 17:58:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 25 May 2002 17:58:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 12024 invoked by uid 97); 25 May 2002 17:58:00 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 11991 invoked by uid 97); 25 May 2002 17:57:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 11974 invoked by uid 98); 25 May 2002 17:57:58 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4198 created Apr 24 2002) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.0.0.1309 Date: Sat, 25 May 2002 18:57:53 +0100 Subject: Re: Vicious Abuse? (an outsiders perspective) From: Pier Fumagalli To: Tomcat Developers List , James Mitchell Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <200205251312.48877.anthony@AWMObjects.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N "Anthony W. Marino" wrote: >> I've been following along with this/these rather ridiculous thread's). >> >> No, I am not a committer, so you can hit the delete key now if you judge >> people by their status. >> >> IMHO, giving someone a -1 is one of the rudest things I have seen on this >> list in quite a while. >> What is most surprising to me, is how you stuck to your ignorant opinion, >> even after so many others were willing to vote them in. > > Isn't that part of the democracy of this process...call it as you see it??? > As long as you can qualify/backup your statements then I see nothing wrong > with it. In fact, I appreciate/welcome it as long as it is handled > professionally and with an open mind such as Pier has demonstrated. > Apparently Dan, too, has expressed his acceptance of Pier's thoughts! Thank you, and I would like to close the "vote" issue here, I believe that my vote had all the rights to be expressed. I don't use SSI, I don't know what's wrong with it, I don't know absolutely anything about the guy who is being proposed to fix those problems. Once he gave me his idea on how things were, and what he wanted to do with, I suddenly changed my vote, before the end of the ballot (3 days after proposal), and welcomed him open arms... I don't think that saying "hold on one second, stop this thing for a while because I don't really get it" and then "ah, ok, cool, I'm fine with it" means being rude... Sorry if someone perceived it somehow differently. Pier -- [Perl] combines all the worst aspects of C and Lisp: a billion of different sublanguages in one monolithic executable. It combines the power of C with the readability of PostScript. [Jamie Zawinski - DNA Lounge - San Francisco] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: