tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Lars George" <l...@worldlingo.com>
Subject Re: New releases
Date Thu, 30 May 2002 06:03:04 GMT
Thanks Colin, that helped!

Does this also mean that the deprecated jk1, which was in exactly the same
code tree does not exist anymore, ie. the current code is jk2 and only that?

-- Lars

----- Original Message -----
From: <costinm@covalent.net>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 3:25 PM
Subject: RE: New releases


> On Thu, 30 May 2002, Lars George wrote:
>
> > - The Apache/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote only implements a
framework.
> > What package does implement the actual protocol, ie. where is
tomcat-jk2?
>
> in j-t-c/jk/java.
>
>
>
> > - The Apache/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native implements mod_jk1 and
> > Apache/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2 implements mod_jk2?
>
> Yes.
>
> Note that the '2' is just a version number, and reflects internal
> code changes and config changes. The actual protocol is the same (ajp13),
> so you can use either implementation. ( there are some extensions and
> many extra features in native2/, but it is backward compatible ).
>
>
> Sory for all confusion - it's just normal software evolution, but
> we try to keep some basic compatibility and interoperability between
> components, and the whole thing is pretty modular and flexible.
> When native2 is released and enough people are satisfied, we'll have a
> simpler story ( until jk3 is started :-)
>
> Costin
>
>
>
> >
> > Thanks again,
> >
> > Lars
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: costinm@covalent.net [mailto:costinm@covalent.net]
> > > Sent: Thursday, 30 May 2002 12:14
> > > To: Tomcat Developers List
> > > Subject: RE: New releases
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 30 May 2002, Lars George wrote:
> > >
> > > > Remy,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the explanation, if the sources in the cvs named
> > > tomcat 4.0 then
> > > > where will I find the 4.0.4 code? Is this branched off and
> > > what would its
> > > > tag/flag be?
> > > >
> > > > One more question if you do not mind, am I correct assuming
> > > that JK2 is only
> > > > for Tomcat 4.1.x and it is named "Coyote" in the connector
> > > package? Sorry,
> > > > me confused!
> > >
> > > Coyote is a set of APIs to abstract the connectors ( http, etc ) and
> > > servlet container. It can be used with any kind of connector and with
> > > any container ( curently 3.3, 4.0, 4.1 - but it is possible to add 3.2
> > > or even other containers ).
> > >
> > > tomcat-jk2 is the java implementation for the ajp13 protocol - and is
> > > using Coyote APIs ( so it works with any servlet container
> > > supported by
> > > coyote ). Same for the http11 implementation.
> > >
> > > On the web server side, you can use either mod_jk1 or mod_jk2. Both
> > > are using the same protocol and will work with any version of tomcat
> > > ( including 3.2.x ). mod_jk2 is getting close to 'stable', but
> > > there is still work going on.
> > >
> > >
> > > Costin
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks a lot,
> > > > Lars
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:remm@apache.org]
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, 30 May 2002 1:58
> > > > > To: Tomcat Developers List
> > > > > Subject: Re: New releases
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Remy,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I would be very happy if the new version would be declared
> > > > > stable. I just
> > > > > > spent 1 man-day to fix a bug in 4.0.3 just to release that
> > > > > this is already
> > > > > > fixed in the current 4.0 sources.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > One question if you don't mind, would this be what I
> > > > > mentioned above, ie.
> > > > > is
> > > > > > the current code in the nightly folder for tomcat 4.0 the
> > > > > latest version
> > > > > you
> > > > > > want to promote to 4.0.4? If so I could get started testing
> > > > > it in our
> > > > > > environment.
> > > > >
> > > > > No, the nightlies are 4.1.x.
> > > > >
> > > > > > Please note that it will also give me a chance to check
> > > this bug I
> > > > > submitted
> > > > > > earlier but which is not handled yet:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9334
> > > > >
> > > > > All the JK guys are working on JK 2, which is a (big)
> > > > > refactoring of JK, and
> > > > > is part of Coyote.
> > > > >
> > > > > Remy
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
>



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message