Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 72509 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2002 14:14:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Apr 2002 14:14:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 3566 invoked by uid 97); 19 Apr 2002 14:14:40 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 3485 invoked by uid 97); 19 Apr 2002 14:14:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 3387 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2002 14:14:39 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: costinm owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 07:14:11 -0700 (PDT) From: X-X-Sender: To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: RE: MinTC, "terrible rudeness", persistence In-Reply-To: <2B9DAAFADEC9C9429CC934AD0F36A3679DA745@NLDNC001PEX1.ubsgs.ubsgroup.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > I have to admit not having read the MinTC source, however, I thought > the tomcat community uses/develops multiple implementations of many > interfaces. Most of the http/socket/auth?/config (xml > file/ajp-webapp/admin) code is effectively multiple implementations of > the same interfaces. Isn't the whole design of catalina intended to > allow different implementations of practically every concrete class? The point is not about developing multiple implementations - but about beeing a part of the community and proposing/discussing changes instead of posting announcements of a fork's releases. Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: