tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From <cost...@covalent.net>
Subject Re: [NITPICK] didn't see this one coming...
Date Mon, 29 Apr 2002 15:59:40 GMT
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:

> Yes, I suppose it's one connector supporting many protocols, so maybe it
> would be a good idea to do that, call the thing "Coyote" and merge the two
> pages (esp since there is little HTTP/1.1 docs needed). Or make one main
> page with sub-pages.

Porbably so - for the java side and server.xml there is no reason to 
confuse people. There is one connector - that's it. 

Probably even 'coyote' can be removed from the docs :-) - if we 
agree ( and so far it seems we do ) that Coyote is going to 
be the default connector ( and I believe we can get a majority 
for both 4.0 and 3.3 to support that ) - then it'll be just that,
'the' connector. 

That doesn't mean the others are not supported - just that we 
recommend one default. 

> I had a question about the autoconfiguration with JK 2. Is it the same as in
> JK 1 ? If it's not, a large part of the documentation is stale.

Yes, using the same code - I can move the config generator from o.a.ajp - 
but it's better to let people use the same class names. 

The autoconfig generates mod_jk1 config ( JkMount, etc ). For 
mod_jk2 the config is different, and a different autoconf will
be used ( I'll send a proposal in the next mail ). 

Costin


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message