tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From <cost...@covalent.net>
Subject Re: MinTC, "terrible rudeness", persistence
Date Fri, 19 Apr 2002 14:39:21 GMT
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Rolf Veen wrote:

> Remy Maucherat wrote:
> 
> > I will veto this (or vote against, if it's a majority vote). It has been
> > very clear for a while that the Tomcat project has to provide one and only
> > one servlet container for a particular version of the specifications.
> 
> That would have been the best. But right now there are two different
> implementations of the 2.2 spec, without any clear winner from the
> user's and also the integrator's point of view. If Tomcat 5 builds on
> Tomcat 4.x, should 3.x die then ? I don't think so.

The 'product' of tomcat-dev is a _community_, not a servlet container. 

And I will -1 any Tomcat 5 proposal that doesn't address this problem
and is acceptable to both 3.x and 4.x people.


It can be either a merge of 3.x with 4.x, or it can start from scratch
with a list of requirements and proposals ( like Xerces 2 or Axis ),
discussed one by one and then implemented by everyone.  I hope 
we'll not end with an ant2 model, with 2-3 different competing 
'proposals' ( all with cat-derived names, but little else in common ).


The work in j-t-c and jasper is a good start. And if Tomcat 5 will have 
both valves and interceptors - but a single community behind it - then
it'll be a success.

Costin









--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message