tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From <>
Subject Re: .sh extension
Date Wed, 17 Apr 2002 14:46:26 GMT
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Keith Wannamaker wrote:

> What is the reason for the '.sh' extensions on our scripts?
> I found this comment from the ant project:
>   "Note: Current Jakarta practice is to name the Unix shell 
>    script with a .sh extension. This goes against Unix 
>    conventions and is unecessary. Testing has shown that the
>    leaving the extension off on Unix will not interfere with
>    the working of the Windows batch file."
> Does anyone else have a preference on this?  What do you
> think of dropping the .sh in either 3 or 4?

+1 for both - but as Nacho mentioned, not in the CVS.
It can be done in build.xml ( in addition make sure chmod is called,
some builds done on windows don't seem to have the x set )


To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
For additional commands, e-mail: <>

View raw message