tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Keith Wannamaker" <Ke...@Wannamaker.org>
Subject .sh extension
Date Wed, 17 Apr 2002 14:02:20 GMT
What is the reason for the '.sh' extensions on our scripts?

I found this comment from the ant project:

  "Note: Current Jakarta practice is to name the Unix shell 
   script with a .sh extension. This goes against Unix 
   conventions and is unecessary. Testing has shown that the
   leaving the extension off on Unix will not interfere with
   the working of the Windows batch file."
  http://jakarta.apache.org/ant/ant2/original-specification.html

Does anyone else have a preference on this?  What do you
think of dropping the .sh in either 3 or 4?

Keith


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message