tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bill Barker" <wbar...@wilshire.com>
Subject Re: Resend: SSL portability and Coyote
Date Fri, 26 Apr 2002 22:32:49 GMT
Also, somebody in o.a.c.tomcat4 needs to fire the ACTION_REQ_SSL_ATTRIBUTE
action.  That's the Coyote replacement for CertificateValve.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Remy Maucherat" <remm@apache.org>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 2:50 PM
Subject: Re: Resend: SSL portability and Coyote


> > This didn't make it out the first time so I'm resending...
> >
> > I'm looking at what needs to be done to make the 3.3 SSL portablity
> > stuff work properly with Coyote. For the most part, this work has been
> > done--if you set the SSLImplementation appropriately and the correct
> > factory gets invoked. However, there appear to be some issues with
> > CoyoteServerSocketFactory and it's handling of configuration
> > directives:
> >
> > (1) CoyoteServerSocketFactory appears to be willing to handle a
> > "socketFactoryName". AFAICT, this is supplanted by SSLImplementation
> > and none of the other code does anything with it. Any reason not to
> > remove support for this directive entirely?
>
> I had no idea what was useful.
>
> > (2) JSSE uses one keyfile (the keystore). PureTLS uses three, the
> > keyfile, the CA file, and the random file. I need to add new
> > directives to ServerSocketFactory to propagate those.
>
> +1.
>
> Remy
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message