Return-Path: 
 <tomcat-dev-return-6491-qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-dev=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@apache.org
Received: (qmail 95925 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2002 19:21:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Feb 2002 19:21:53 -0000
Received: (qmail 25854 invoked by uid 97); 28 Feb 2002 19:21:33 -0000
Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 25811 invoked by uid 97); 28 Feb 2002 19:21:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tomcat-dev-subscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" <tomcat-dev.jakarta.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" <tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 25758 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2002 19:21:32 -0000
Sender: ekr@rtfm.com
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [4.0.3] [VOTES] Upcoming release and security fix
References: <01d301c1c08b$663dd540$6501a8c0@apache.org>
Reply-to: EKR <ekr@rtfm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: 28 Feb 2002 11:22:16 -0800
In-Reply-To: "Remy Maucherat"'s message of "Thu, 28 Feb 2002 11:09:08 -0800"
Message-ID: <kj4rk11kev.fsf@romeo.rtfm.com>
Lines: 39
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.45/XEmacs 20.4 - "Emerald"
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

"Remy Maucherat" <remm@apache.org> writes:

> Since there are apparently diverging opinions on the subject (and also since
> I didn't get any +1s for a possible 4.0.3 b1, or a 4.0.2a release), here's a
> formal request for vote.
> 
> On the security problem reported yesterday, affecting the security manager
> sandboxing. We should:
> <ballot>
> A [ ] Make a full 4.0.3 (or 4.0.2a) release which would only include the
> security fix
> B [ ] Make the security fix available as a binary patch for 4.0.2 (it would
> take the form of an archive to extract in $CATALINA_HOME, and would be
> *small*)
> C [ ] Accelerate the release schedule of 4.0.3, which would include the
> security fix, as well as fixes for other issues with 4.0.2 (with Beta 1 on
> 03/01 and Final on 03/08)
> </ballot>
My vote is C.

> In parallel, I'd like to release a first beta of 4.0.3 on 03/01 (depending
> on the vote on item 'C' above, the release cycle may be shorter or longer):
> <ballot>
> +1 [ ] I support the release, and I will help
> +0 [ ] I support the release
> -0 [ ] I don't support the release
> -1 [ ] I'm against the release because:
> 
> 
> </ballot>
> 
> My vote is +1.
+0

-Ekr

-- 
[Eric Rescorla                                   ekr@rtfm.com]
                http://www.rtfm.com/

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>