tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6090] - Listener not instantiated in tld file
Date Fri, 01 Feb 2002 23:12:35 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6090>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6090

Listener not instantiated in tld file





------- Additional Comments From kevinj@develop.com  2002-02-01 23:12 -------
Craig,

> Kevin, your "simple" test case is a little too simple, so this TLD is going to
> fail XML validation and be rejected.  Why?  If you look at the DTD for tag 
> library descriptors, you'll see that "tag" has a "+" after it -- in other 
> words, a valid TLD must have at least one <tag> element.  
> (Yes, that is a horrible bug in the spec, but nothing we can do 
> about it this time around ...)
> So, you should be getting a stack trace from a failed validation in one of 
> the log files -- if not (haven't checked yet) that is clearly a Tomcat bug.

agreed, but I'm not seeing failures, there's no stack dump and my real test 
case does have <tag>s in the tld and that didn't work either.

I've fixed the tld and I'm still not seeing it.


> None of this, of course, would explain why a valid (in the XML sense) TLD 
> with a listener in it wouldn't work for you ...

Can you re-create this, or is it just me?

Kevin

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message