tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bill Barker" <wbar...@wilshire.com>
Subject Re: [PATCH] MinimalTomcat, Coupling, Bugs 6669, 6670
Date Tue, 26 Feb 2002 20:17:31 GMT

----- Original Message -----
From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <craigmcc@apache.org>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 8:31 AM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MinimalTomcat, Coupling, Bugs 6669, 6670
>
> When looking at what it took to set up Catalina's connectors for the "run
> as root" scenario, we came to the same conclusion -- ideally, Lifecycle
> should have included an init() method, and probably a destroy() method as
> well.  At the time we looked, there would have been roughly 40 classes
> that would need the new methods, plus calls to them in a bunch more, so we
> chickened out and only implemented init()  on the connectors themselves.
>
> I'm game to look at this more broadly, but the number of changes required
> to implement it is pretty significant.
>
I don't see any great need to re-factor core.  All I was suggesting was two
events, to make it easier to write Listeners to add functionality.  As I
stated in another message, there is no reason to do this just for
ApacheConfig, since its functionality will be replaced in a few months (when
JK2 rolls out).

> > As I said, this is IMHO.  Attempts to start a flame-war will be quietly
> > ignored.
> >
>
> +1.
>
> Craig
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message