Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 83836 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2001 15:20:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Dec 2001 15:20:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 316 invoked by uid 97); 1 Dec 2001 15:20:15 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 300 invoked by uid 97); 1 Dec 2001 15:20:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 289 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2001 15:20:14 -0000 Sender: ekr@rtfm.com To: "Tomcat Developers List" Subject: Re: Submission: Portable SSL Support References: Reply-to: EKR Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Eric Rescorla Date: 01 Dec 2001 07:20:13 -0800 In-Reply-To: 's message of "Fri, 30 Nov 2001 23:33:33 -0800 (PST)" Message-ID: Lines: 12 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.45/XEmacs 20.4 - "Emerald" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N writes: > What remains to be done is getting jk to reuse the same abstractions > for ssl support - that would make the code cleaner. But it can wait a > while, there are bigger changes going on there. That's what I figured. I took a look at that and it doesn't look very difficult so if someone just pings me when it's ready to be adapted :) -Ekr -- [Eric Rescorla ekr@rtfm.com] http://www.rtfm.com/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: